Believe it or not, I might subscribe to Dominic Cummings' newsletter before the newsletters of certain other public figures (who shall remain nameless because mentioning them might offend their supporters).
But think of all the inside information you could discover! (I wonder if there's anything to stop a reporter from subscribing and then reporting the information. 🤔)
What I can’t get my head around, is why anyone cares what a disgruntled, self-serving, self-promoting guy - who, let’s face it, was operating at the heart administration that he is now lambasting - has to say? I’m not defending the things he’s now claiming to expose, but I’m not sure how anyone benefits from his prattle (other than the media and the opposition using to take hindsight pot shots at situations they probably would have handled just as well/badly). No, I wouldn’t subscribe (even if it was free)
On Twitter in the past couple of days, I've seen several sentiments similar to yours, which I expect are shared by many people. I've also seen several people saying they've subscribed. (I'm guessing that, while they won't tweet about it, someone at every major news outlet in the UK has subscribed. Probably someone associated with each of the political parties too. As you say, the media and opposition may benefit.)
Believe it or not, I might subscribe to Dominic Cummings' newsletter before the newsletters of certain other public figures (who shall remain nameless because mentioning them might offend their supporters).
Absent your glowing recommendation, Scott, I would not dream of it.
But think of all the inside information you could discover! (I wonder if there's anything to stop a reporter from subscribing and then reporting the information. 🤔)
What I can’t get my head around, is why anyone cares what a disgruntled, self-serving, self-promoting guy - who, let’s face it, was operating at the heart administration that he is now lambasting - has to say? I’m not defending the things he’s now claiming to expose, but I’m not sure how anyone benefits from his prattle (other than the media and the opposition using to take hindsight pot shots at situations they probably would have handled just as well/badly). No, I wouldn’t subscribe (even if it was free)
On Twitter in the past couple of days, I've seen several sentiments similar to yours, which I expect are shared by many people. I've also seen several people saying they've subscribed. (I'm guessing that, while they won't tweet about it, someone at every major news outlet in the UK has subscribed. Probably someone associated with each of the political parties too. As you say, the media and opposition may benefit.)